Allowed

Asfak Son of Nawab Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 Aug 2024CRLMB/2986/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a bail application after observing that the petitioner, a senior citizen, was re-arrested with newly available medical evidence despite previous acquittal. The court noted significant trial delays and adjourned the trial to allow for prosecution response. Bail was granted conditionally with deposits towards costs.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on condition of depositing Rs. 50,000 within two months as costs forfeitable if no appearance for trial within six months. Trial adjourned to October 19, 2024.

Asfak Son of Nawab Khan Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2986/2023

¶3

Asfak Son Of Nawab Khan, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Village Achera, Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Presently Resident Of House No. 15, Major Bane Singh Colony, Khatipua, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ( Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

1- State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶7

2- Saleem Khan S/o Hazi Ali Bux, age 42 Years

¶8

3- Smt. Rubina w/o late Shri Sameer Khan, age 26 Years

¶9

4- Haxi Ali Bux son of Shri Jawahar, aged about 82 years;

¶10

5- Amjat son of Nawab Khan;

¶11

6- Nawab Khan son of Hazi;

¶12

All are resident of House No. 15, Major Bane singh Colony, Khatipura, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶13

----Respondent

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Sarthak Saxena Mr. Heramb Saraswat
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Shri Ram Dhakar, P.P. Ms. Zeenat Khan,
	Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶16

Order

¶17

21/08/2024

¶18

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vlQkd dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 04-03-2023 ds fo:) ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk] mls iqfyl Fkkuk oS'kkyh uxj] t;iqj if'pe esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 505@2022] ls'ku izdj.k la[;k& 04@2023] ljdkj cuke uokc [kka o vU;] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk

¶19

[CRLMB-2986/2023]

¶20

(2 of 3)

¶21

143] 341] 323] 325 ,oa 302 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶22

cgl lquh xbZA

¶23

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] og funksZ"k gSA izdj.k dh ?kVuk fnukad 19-10-2022 dh jgh gS rFkk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 23-10-2022 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA bl ?kVuk esa ifjoknh i{k ds rhu et:[email protected] Jherh :chuk] vyh&cD'k ,oa lyhe jgs gSa] ftuds c;ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k gks pqds gSaA et:cku ,oa p'enhn xokg lyhe us vfHk;kstu i{k dk leFkZu ugha fd;k gSA p'enhn lk{kh o et:c vyh&cD'k dh lk{; Hkh gks pqdh gS] ftudh lk{; esa ,sls dksbZ rF; ugha vk, gS] ftlls ;g izdV gks fd izkFkhZ v'kQkd }kjk lehj ds lkFk ekjihV dh xbZ gksA vU; xokg Jherh :chuk tks fd e`rd lehj dh iRuh gS] mlus fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k viuh lk{; esa foLrkj fd;k gS] tks rF; izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ,oa mlds c;ku varxZr /kkjk 161 na0iz0la0 esa ugha Fks] mu rF;ksa dh Hkh lk{; nh gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkosA

¶24

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd ,oa ifjoknh ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd vfHk;kstu i{k dh vksj ls lk{; esa dqy 31 lk{khx.k j[ks x, gSa] ftuesa ls 25 lk{khx.k ds c;ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k gks pqds gSa] ,slh fLFkfr esa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ugha gSA vr% izdj.k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶25

geus nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksaZ o fordksZa ij fopkj fd;kA izdj.k ds rhuksa et:cku@ifjoknh i{k Jherh :chuk] vyh c['k vkSj lyhe ds dFkuksa ij fopkj fd;kA p'enhn lk{kh lyhe us vfHk;kstu i{k dk leFkZu ugha fd;k gSA p'enhn lk{kh@et:c vyhcD'k dh lk{; esa vfHk;qDr vlQkd }kjk e`rd lehj ds lkFk ekjihV fd, tkus dh lk{; izdV ugha gqbZ gSA vr% fopkj.k ds nkSjku vk;h lk{khx.k dh lk{;] izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] izkFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le;

¶26

[CRLMB-2986/2023]

¶27

o vU; leLr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶28

ifj.kker% ;g tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@&:i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vlQkd iq= Jh uokc [kk a dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶29

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶30

MANOJ ADWANI /25

Asfak Son of Nawab Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Asfak Son of Nawab Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Pratap and Another Vs Puran and Others

Mst. Aawda W/O Ahsaan Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Arjun Lal S/O Shri Lachhuram Rewad Vs State of Rajasthan

Ad-Hoc Executive Committi Vs Manoj Sharma and Others

Kalu S/O Shri Gopal Vs Topkhana Desh Greh Nirman Sehkari Samiti Ltd.

M/S Mahindra Holidays and Resorts India Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner, Commercital Taxes