Allowed

Mst. Aawda W/O Ahsaan Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Aug 2024CRLMB/3873/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed three connected anticipatory bail applications under IPC 438. The judgment addressed the procedural lapse in the initial FIR date and noted the discriminatory over-inclusion of women in the trial, directing the police to grant temporary bail to absconding female witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to petitioners on temporary bail conditions including appearance before local court within 50,000/- security, 25,000/- family bond, and non-interference.

Mst. Aawda W/O Ahsaan Khan Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:34951]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3873/2024

¶4

Mst. Aawda W/o Ahsaan Khan, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Kunder, Police Station Ucchain, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶5

Manjuran W/o Aspak Khan, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Kunder, Police Station Ucchain, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4773/2024

¶12

Usman Khan S/o Muneer Khan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Kunder, Police Station Uchchain, District Bharatpur, Raj.

¶13

Farman S/o Muneer Khan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kunder, Police Station Uchchain, District Bharatpur, Raj.

¶14

Akbar Khan S/o Nijamuddin, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Kunder, Police Station Uchchain, District Bharatpur, Raj.

¶15

----Petitioners

¶16

Versus

¶17

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶18

----Respondent

¶19

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7626/2024

¶20

Asfak Khan S/o Alisher, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Kunder, Police Station, Ucchain, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan)

¶21

Islam S/o Alisher, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Kunder, Police Station, Ucchain, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan)

¶22

----Petitioners

¶23

Versus

¶24

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶25

----Respondent

¶26

For Petitioner(s) : Jh jkgqy 'kekZ Jh ;ksxs'k fla?ky

¶27

[2024:RJ-JP:34951] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3873/2024] For Respondent(s) : Jh Jhjke /kkdM+] yksd vfHk;kstd Jh nh{kkUr tSu] vf/koDrk ifjoknh _______________________________________________

¶28

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶29

Order

¶30

20-08-2024

¶31

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 18-03-2024 ds fo:) ;s rhuksa iFkd&iFkd vfxze tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk] mUg s a iqfyl Fkkuk mPpSu] ftyk Hkjriqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &420@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 143] 323] 341] 452] 325] 336] 308 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vfxze tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶32

cgl lquh xbZA

¶33

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd ?kVuk fnukad 31-10-2022 dh jgh gS tcfd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fnukad 01-11-2022 dks ntZ djok;h xbZ gS A izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa 28 O;fDr;ksa ds uke fy[kk, x, gS A lg vfHk;qDrx.k ds fu;fer tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd, tk pqds gS A vuqla/kku ds nkSjku /kkjk 308 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk tksM+h x;h gS] izkFkhZx.k esa dqN efgyk,sa gSa A mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk vuqla/kku esa Hkkx ys fy;k x;k gS] vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko’;drk ugha gS] vr% izkFkhZx.k dks vfxze tekur ij NksMk tkosA

¶34

;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd o ;ksX; vf/koDrk ifjoknh us vfxze tekur vkosnu i=ksa dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk yksd vfHk;kstd us izdj.k dh rF;kRed fjiksVZ izLrqr dhA

¶35

geus nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa] fordksZa ij euu fd;k A rF;kRed fjiksVZ dk voyksdu fd;k A lg vfHk;qDrx.k ds fu;fer tekur gks pqdh gS] izkFkhZx.k }kjk vuqla/kku esa Hkkx ys fy;k x;k gSA vr% vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vkbZ lk{;] nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdkZs] izdj.k dh

¶36

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-3873/2024]

¶37

[2024:RJ-JP:34951]

¶38

rF;kRed fLFkfr] ,oa izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq,] izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;s vfxze tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;s tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶39

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;s rhuksa vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkrs gS rFkk vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh@Fkkukf/kdkjh iqfyl Fkkuk] mPpSu] ftyk Hkjriqj dks funsZ'k fn;s tkrs gSa fd muds ;gka iathc) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &420@2022 esa izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k eqlEekr vkonk iRuh vglku [kku] eUtwju iRuh vlikd [kku] mleku [kku iq= equhj [kka] Qjeku iq= equhj [kka] vdcj [kku iq= futkeqnnhu] vlikd [kku iq= vyh'ksj o bLyke iq= vyh'ksj dks fxjQrkj fd;s tkus dh lwjr esa ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZ muds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i;s v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa 25]000&25]000@& v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s jkf'k dh nks tekursa izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mUgsa fuEu 'krkZas ds v/khu tekur ij vktkn dj fn;k tk,%&

¶40

1- fd izkFkhZx.k iqfyl vf/kdkjh }kjk iwNs tkus okys ifjiz'uksa dk

¶41

mRrj nsus ds fy;s tSls vkSj tc visf{kr gks] miyC/k gksaxsA

¶42

2- fd izkFkhZx.k bl ekeys ds rF;ksa ls voxr fdlh O;fDr dks U;k;ky; ;k fdlh iqfyl vf/kdkjh ds le{k ,sls rF;ksa dks

¶43

izdV u djus ds fy;s eukus ds okLrs izR;{k% vFkok ijks{k :i ls mls dksbZ mRizsj.kk] /kedh ;k opu ugha nsaxsA

¶44

3- fd izkFkhZx.k fcuk U;k;ky; dh iwoZ vuqefr ds Hkkjr ugha NksM+saxsA

¶45

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶46

Rishikesh Soni/12-14

Mst. Aawda W/O Ahsaan Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mst. Aawda W/O Ahsaan Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar S/O Ramgiri Vs State of Rajasthan

Suriaya Durrany Widow of Late Dr. Khurram Shah Durrany Daughter of Shri Mumtaz Alam, Vs Nishant Alam S/O Shri Mumtaz Alam

Raju Nath S/O Shri Ramkuwar Nath Vs State of Rajasthan

Ram Pratap and Another Vs Puran and Others

Arjun Lal S/O Shri Lachhuram Rewad Vs State of Rajasthan

Pawan Bagda S/O Shri Prahlad Bagda Vs State of Rajasthan