Court allowed early listing of bail application. Petitioners did not press the application but sought liberty to file a fresh one after recording statements. Court dismissed the application as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:22398]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2668/2024
(At present Lodged In Sub Jail Anupgarh)
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.S. Gharsana For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
17/05/2024
The case comes up on an application (01/24)for early listing the bail application.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up today itself.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not press the present bail application at this stage, however, seeks liberty to file fresh bail application after recording the statements of Seizure Officer and Investigation Officer before learned trial Court.
[2024:RJ-JD:22398]
[CRLMB-2668/2024]
(2 of 2)
Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty aforesaid.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
33-SanjayS/-
Sohan Singh @ Soni @ Sonu S/o Roshan Singh
Satnam Singh @ Sattu S/o Bharpoor Singh
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
