Allowed

Chandra Mohan @ C.M. Gomladu @ Ballu @ Chandra Prakash S/O Shri Ghasilal v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Jan 2024CRLMB/218/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences including Section 436 IPC; charge-sheet filed and petitioner long in judicial custody. Court granted bail without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Chandra Mohan @ C.M. Gomladu @ Ballu @ Chandra Prakash S/O… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:1581]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

218/2024

¶5

Chandra Mohan @ C.M. Gomladu @ Ballu @ Chandra Prakash S/o Shri Ghasilal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Puranwas, Police Station Lawan, District Dausa (Raj.) (Presently Confined At District Jail, Dausa).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

Madan Lal S/o Shri Rampal, R/o Village Durgawata, Police Station Lawan, District Dausa (Raj.).

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena, Adv. For : Mr. N.S. Gurjar, Asst. G.A. Respondent(s)

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶13

10/01/2024

¶14

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.101/2023 registered at Police Station Lawan, District Dausa for the offence(s) under Section(s) 436, 504, 506, 427 & 34 of IPC.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits

[2024:RJ-JP:1581]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-218/2024]

that charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶21

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Chandra Mohan @ C.M. Gomladu @ Ballu @ Chandra Prakash S/o Shri Ghasilal shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

YOGESH KUMAR /111

Chandra Mohan @ C.M. Gomladu @ Ballu @ Chandra Prakash S/O Shri Ghasilal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandra Mohan @ C.M. Gomladu @ Ballu @ Chandra Prakash S/O Shri Ghasilal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahrukh Pathan @ Shahrukh Kasai S/O Mohammad Ishak Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilip Kumar S/O Bihari Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Yogesh Sain S/O Roop Narayan Sain Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas @ Vicky Son of Shri Pappu Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Urf Dedh Futiya S/O Shri Amichand Vs State of Rajasthan

Amzad S/O Salim Vs State of Rajasthan