Allowed

Dilip Kumar S/O Bihari Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Jan 2024CRLMB/88/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by an accused charged under Sections 143, 341, 323, 324, 325 and 307 IPC and Sections 4/25 Arms Act. Charge sheet filed; similarly situated co-accused already released on bail; petitioner long in judicial custody. Bail allowed on personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with condition to appear on all dates of hearing.

Dilip Kumar S/O Bihari Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:1259]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

88/2024

¶5

Dilip Kumar S/o Bihari Lal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Badgaon, Police Station Seeswali, Tehsil Maangrol, District Baran (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Baran)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma, Adv. For : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, Respondent(s) P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 09/01/2024

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.98/2023 registered at Police Station Seeswali, District Baran for the offence(s) under Section(s) 143, 341, 323, 324, 325 & 307 IPC and under Section(s) 4/25 of Arms Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. She further submits that charge sheet has been filed and similarly situated co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. She also

[2024:RJ-JP:1259]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-88/2024]

submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Dilip Kumar S/o Bihari Lal shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

DANISH USMANI /13

Dilip Kumar S/O Bihari Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar S/O Bihari Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Virendra Kumar @ Bittu S/O Shri Matadin Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Abhay @ Monti S/O Shri Mataprasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas @ Bhairiya Son of Shri Mahendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Shahrukh Pathan @ Shahrukh Kasai S/O Mohammad Ishak Vs State of Rajasthan

Yogesh Sain S/O Roop Narayan Sain Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Kumar Kuldeep S/O Shri Naharuram Vs State of Rajasthan