Allowed

Sunil Sharma S/O Shri Ram Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Mar 2024CRLMB/2112/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to two petitioners arrested in connection with the same FIR. Being offences triable by Magistrate and petitioners lacking criminal antecedents, bail was allowed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. with personal and surety bonds to appear before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners Sunil Sharma and Sandeep Gupta released on bail; personal bond Rs.50,000 with two surety bonds Rs.25,000 each.

Sunil Sharma S/O Shri Ram Kumar Sharma Vs… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:10784]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

2112/2024

¶5

Sunil Sharma S/o Shri Ram Kumar Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Plot No. 18, Banshi Sadan, Near Jain Tample, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur -East (Raj.), Present Resident Chankya Enterprises, Address - 10-C, Gauri Vihar New Sanganer Road, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶12

2137/2024

¶13

Sandeep Gupta S/o Shri Sitaram Mahajan, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Surajgarh, Tehsil Surajgarh, Police Station Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Presently Tenant Flat No. F-1, Ashirwad 7, Joshi Marg, Police Station Jhotwara, Jaipur, Presently Shop Balaji Enterprises, Shop No. 10, Kalwar Road, Joshi Marg, Police Station Jhotwara, Jaipur. (Presently Confined At Central Jail Jaipur).

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶17

----Respondent

¶18

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. Bhinda For : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP Respondent(s)

¶19

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

Order

01/03/2024

[CRLMB-2112/2024]

[2024:RJ-JP:10784]

(2 of 3)

Since both bail applications are arising out of the same FIR, hence with the consent of the counsel for the parties, arguments have been heard together and both bail applications are being decided by this common order.

¶26

Both bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. have been filed by petitioners in connection with FIR No.462/2023 registered at Police Station Jawahar Circle District Jaipur City (East) wherein they are charged for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, & 120-B of IPC.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the alleged offences are triable by the Court of Magistrate and the petitioners are not having any criminal antecedents. Counsel submits that the petitioners are in custody since

¶28

the date of their arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, so indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioners.

¶29

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applications.

¶30

Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the alleged offences are triable by the Court of Magistrate and the petitioners are not having any criminal antecedents and also looking to the fact that the petitioners are in custody since the date of their arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the

(3 of 3)

[2024:RJ-JP:10784]

[CRLMB-2112/2024]

case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶35

Accordingly, both bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that accused-

¶36

petitioners Sunil Sharma S/o Shri Ram Kumar Sharma, and Sandeep Gupta S/o Sitaram Mahajan arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶37

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶38

Diksha/47-48

Sunil Sharma S/O Shri Ram Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Sharma S/O Shri Ram Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sheru @ Sher Mauhammad S/O Jagmal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Jangid S/O Shri Chitarmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju Samota S/O Shri Omprakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganesh Narayan Alias Ganesh S/O Late Shri Moolchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Ranvindarsingh S/O Shri Jarnelsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Laxminarain S/O Shri Balu Vs State of Rajasthan