Allowed

Virdha Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Jan 2024CRLMB/19/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Bail Application under Section 439 Cr.P.C filed regarding charges under the Rajasthan Excise Act. The court, without commenting on case merits, considered submissions and held it just and proper to grant bail upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Virdha Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:834]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 19/2024

¶4

Virdha Ram S/o Chutra Ram, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Sihaniya, P.s. Sedwa, Dist. Barmer. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Barmer)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. RJ Punia
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Gaurav Singh,Addl.GA

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

08/01/2024

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner Virdha Ram S/o Chutra Ram under Section 439 Cr.P.C against the order impugned passed by learned court below in connection with FIR No.24/2023-24 registered at Police Station Excise Inspector Circle Barmer, District Barmer for the offence(s) under Sections 19/54 and 54A Rajasthan Excise Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that he is behind the bars and trial may take long time to conclude thus, he deserves to be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits and demerits of the case,

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:834]

[CRLMB-19/2024]

this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner shall be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid FIR provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Lower Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶23

115-Arti/-

Virdha Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virdha Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jyoti Vs State of Rajasthan

Ritika Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Hathi Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra @ Raju Ram @ Hanuta Ram Vs State of Rajasthan