Allowed

Mahesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Jan 2024CRLMB/111/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application allowed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur. The court deemed it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner accused of offences under IPC Section 379 and Mines & Minerals Act without commenting on merits.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Mahesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:607]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 111/2024

¶4

Mahesh Kumar S/o Shri Bhagirath Mal @ Bhagchand, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Dhani Takhran, Aantri Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj) (At Present Lodge In Sub Jail Kuchaman City )

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ashwani Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. SS Rajpurohit,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

05/01/2024

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner Mahesh Kumar S/o Bhagirath Mal @ Bhagchand under Section 439 Cr.P.C against the order impugned passed by learned court below in connection with FIR No.215/2023 registered at Police Station Khunkhuna District Nagaur for the offence(s) under Sections 379 IPC and 4/21 of Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that he is behind the bars and trial may take long time to conclude thus, he deserves to be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

¶15

Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the

[2024:RJ-JD:607]

[CRLMB-111/2024]

(2 of 2)

case, without commenting on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner shall be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid FIR provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Lower Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶22

605-Arti/-

Mahesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohit Jindal Vs State

Kishna Ram @ Kailash Vs State of Rajasthan

Deepak Goad Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagwanti Vs State of Rajasthan

Ishwar Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Paras Ram @ Paras Mal Vs State of Rajasthan