High Court granted the petitioner permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., directing the concerned court to decide the pending bail application expeditiously on surrender.
Permission granted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application; liberty to surrender and file before concerned court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:24305]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
1846/2024
Mukesh Meena S/o Nathulal Meena, R/o Sidra, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Chawla, Adv., for Mr. Pallav Choudhary, Adv. For : Mr. Riyasat Ali, P.P. Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
22/05/2024
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with liberty to him to surrender before the concerned Court.
Permission as sought for is granted.
This bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
However, if the petitioner surrenders himself and files the bail application before the concerned Court, it is expected from the concerned court to
[2024:RJ-JP:24305] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1846/2024]
decide the bail application of the petitioner preferably on the same day, in accordance with law.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
YOGESH KUMAR /131
Mukesh Meena
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
