Lalchand S/O Chunnilal v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal miscellaneous bail applications dismissed as infructuous without substantive reasoning.
Criminal miscellaneous bail applications dismissed as infructuous without substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:24045]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
2340/2024
Lalchand S/o Chunnilal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Deenyakhedi, Police Station Ratlai, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Jhalawar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4787/2024
Lalchand S/o Chunni Lal, R/o Dinayakhedi, P.s. Ratlai, Dist. Jhalawar. (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rizwan Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Amit Dadhich, Adv.
For : Mr. Sanjeev Mehla, P.P. Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
21/05/2024
Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that these criminal misc. bail applications have become infructuous.
[2024:RJ-JP:24045] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2340/2024]
In view of above, these criminal misc. bail applications are dismissed as having become infructuous.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
YOGESH KUMAR /55-56
Lalchand S/o Chunnilal
Lalchand S/o Chunni Lal
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
UMA SHANKER VYAS
YOGESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court