Rajasthan High Court dismissed a bail application not pressed by the petitioner, granting leave to file a fresh application after seizure officer statements are recorded.
Leave of Court granted to file a fresh bail application after Seizure Officer statements are recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:11169]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1818/2024
Vinod Bajiya S/o Shri Premaram Bajiya, Aged About 25 Years, B/ c Jat, R/o Pyava, P.s Khunkhuna, Dist. Nagaur. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Nagaur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Mangi Lal Vishnoi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Shrawan Kumar,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
06/03/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the instant bail application at this stage but, he craves leave of the Court to file a fresh bail application after the statements of the Seizure Officer are recorded.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty prayed for. It is expected from the trial court that the statements of the Seizure Officer will be recorded on priority basis.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
54-himanshu/-
Vinod Bajiya
State Of Rajasthan
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
