Allowed

Krishankant @ Sonu @ Ghaghara S/O Shri Dilip Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Jan 2024CRLMB/180/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench allowed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case where the trial court had previously reported the petitioner as acquitted, granting bail with specific financial bond conditions upon furnishing.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed subject to furnishing a joint bank guarantee of Rs. 50,000 for judicial expenses and Rs. 25,000 for police expenses, callable upon demand by the Sessions Court.

Krishankant @ Sonu @ Ghaghara S/O Shri Dilip Singh Vs… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:1709]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 180/2024

¶4

Krishankant @ Sonu @ Ghaghara S/o Shri Dilip Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 20, Gajrawadi Society, Behind Safari Hotel, Ring Road, Odhav, P.s. Odhav, Ahemdabad City (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant Sharma, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Order

¶12

10/01/2024

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr d`".kdkar mQZ lksuw mQZ ?k?kjk dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns”k fnukad 03-01-2024 ds fo:) ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk& fd'kux<+] ftyk vyoj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 64@2023 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 19@54] 14@54 jkt0 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd, tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZA

¶15

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks ekeys esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gS] og funksZ"k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 18-12-2023 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k ds vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k iznhi flag ,oa dqynhi flag dk tekur vkosnu i= iwoZ esa gh blh U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj fd, tk pqds gSa] izkFkhZ dk ekeyk muls fHkUu ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZ ekSds ij ekStwn ugha Fkk] muls dksbZ cjkenxh Hkh ugha gqbZ gS] izkFkhZ dks

[CRLMB-180/2024]

[2024:RJ-JP:1709]

(2 of 2)

okgu dk ekfyd gksus ds dkj.k vijk/k ls tksM+k x;k gSA ekeys dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶20

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k ,oa vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶21

nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdksZa] izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; ,oa vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i,½ dh nks lqn<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk”k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is”kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr d".kdkar m Q Z lksuw mQZ ?k?kjk iq= Jh fnyhi flag dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa okafNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶23

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶24

MANOJ ADWANI/39

Krishankant @ Sonu @ Ghaghara S/O Shri Dilip Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishankant @ Sonu @ Ghaghara S/O Shri Dilip Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arjunram Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Shrinath Singh S/O Bachhu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Satish Bheel S/O Bablu Babor Vs State of Rajasthan

Shiv Charan Vs State

Yogesh Kumar Sharma Son of Nandlal Sharma, by Caste Brahmin Vs Darvesh Wife of Yogesh Kumar, by Caste Brahmin