Allowed petitioner's prayer to withdraw criminal leave to appeal. Dismissed the leave to appeal accordingly and disposed of pending stay application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Permission to withdraw leave to appeal granted; leave to appeal dismissed; stay application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:8278]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Leave To Appeal No. 77/2024
----Accusd-Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Ms. Mahi Yadav,Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Suresh Kumar, Public Prosecutor |
| Mr. Himanshu Saxeena, |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order
16/02/2024
Learned counsel appearing for the accused-petitioners has prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the present leave to appeal.
Permission as sought for is granted.
Accordingly, the present leave to appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Stay & Application u/s.5 of Limitation Act also stand disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
ASHOK/307
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manav Surgical Proprietor Jaideep Kaushik
State of Rajasthan
Nippon Steel Pipe India Pvt. Ltd
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
