Allowed

Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Feb 2024CRLMB/178/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 439 CrPC for a petitioner arrested for IPC offences including attempt to murder under FIR No.262/2023, Raniwara police station. Parties had resolved their dispute amicably; the court granted bail on a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail under Section 439 CrPC on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.

Anil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:7537]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 178/2024

¶4

Anil Kumar S/o Uttam Chand, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dahipur, Raniwara Police Station, District Jalore. (Lodged In Sub Jail, Bhinmal)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Hussain Khan S/o Ganni Khan Muslim, R/o Dahipura, Tehsil Raniwara, District Jalore.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. VijayRajBishnoi
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP
	Mr. Jai Kishan Haniya for R-2

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

13/02/2024

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.262/2023 of Police Station – Raniwara, District Sanchore for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 458, 509, 354, 307 and 120-B of IPC and section 3/25 of Arms Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this present case. It is further submitted that parties have resolved their dispute amicably. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

[2024:RJ-JD:7537]

[CRLMB-178/2024]

(2 of 2)

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application .

¶19

Learned counsel for the complainant has not disputed the aforesaid fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably. 5) Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Anil Kumar S/o Uttam Chand shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.262/2023 of Police Station – Raniwara, District Sanchore, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶22

503-neha/-

Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nemichand Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Rama Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Basanti Devi Purbia Vs State of Rajasthan

Harikesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Amir Vs State of Rajasthan

Ranaram Vs State of Rajasthan