Allowed

Lalchand Gurjar Urf Lala Gujar S/O Shri Ghasiram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Jan 2024CRLMB/16315/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a case involving offences under the IPC and Arms Act, deeming it just and proper to release the petitioner on personal and surety bonds without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail to furnish personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Lalchand Gurjar Urf Lala Gujar S/O Shri… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:1933]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

16315/2023

¶5

Lalchand Gurjar Urf Lala Gujar S/o Shri Ghasiram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Dhani Tejala Tan Ghata Gwar Police Station Sadar District Neemkathana Raj. (Accused In Jc At District Jail Neemkathana).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

Govardhan Singh S/o Narendra Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kurbada Police Station Kotwali Neemkathana District Neemkathana Sikar.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. Bhinda, Adv. For : Mr. N.S. Gurjar, Asst. G.A. Respondent(s)

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order

¶13

11/01/2024

¶14

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.381/2023 registered at Police Station Neem Ka Thana (Sikar), District Neem Ka Thana for the offence(s) under Section(s) 307, 323, 397, 460, 34 & 120-B of IPC and Section 27 of Arms Act.

¶15

[2024:RJ-JP:1933]

¶16

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-16315/2023]

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged injury has been inflicted by the co-accused person and not by the present accused-petitioner. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Lalchand Gurjar Urf Lala Gujar S/o Shri Ghasiram is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before

¶21

[2024:RJ-JP:1933] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16315/2023]

¶22

that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as

¶23

and when called upon to do so.

¶24

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶25

GAURAV SHARMA /80

Lalchand Gurjar Urf Lala Gujar S/O Shri Ghasiram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalchand Gurjar Urf Lala Gujar S/O Shri Ghasiram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas @ Vicky Son of Shri Pappu Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Urf Dedh Futiya S/O Shri Amichand Vs State of Rajasthan

Amzad S/O Salim Vs State of Rajasthan

Kailash S/O Narayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Sameer @ Lala S/O Shri Nasaruddin Vs State of Rajasthan

Ujjwal Vishwas S/O Bharat Chandra Vishwash Vs State of Rajasthan