High Court allowed bail applications for five accused-petitioners under Section 483 BNSS. The court noted exclusion of Magistrate jurisdiction and prolonged custody led to enlargement on bail with personal bond and sureties.
Enlarged accused-petitioners on bail subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:52575]
[CRLMB-15753/2024]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order
20/12/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:52575]
[CRLMB-15753/2024]
(2 of 3)
1. Saikul S/o Juhar Kha 2. Vakil S/o Farukh 3. Sabir S/o
Kayyum 4. Naseem S/o Isa & 5. Bilal S/o Jamshed in connection with FIR No.214/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg shall be enlarged on bail provided each of
[2024:RJ-JP:52575] (3 of 3)
[CRLMB-15753/2024]
them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR), J
Keshav/246-247
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail applications filed under Section 483 BNSS should be allowed given the exclusive jurisdiction of the Magistrate and potential delay in trial.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Saikul S/o Juhar Kha
Vakil S/o Farukh
Sabir S/o Kayyum
Naseem S/o Isa
Bilal S/o Jamshed
State Of Rajasthan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
