Allowed

Bharatsingh S/O Bhonilal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Jan 2024CRLMB/16142/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 439 CrPC for two accused charged under Sections 143, 452, 307, 504, 506 IPC. Court noted their distinct role, absence of prior antecedents, and custody since December 2023, and granted bail on personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Bharatsingh S/O Bhonilal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:3367]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

16142/2023

¶5

Bharatsingh S/o Bhonilal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Khakragujran Police Station Dangipura (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶6

Vishnu S/o Bharatsingh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Khakra Gujran Police Station Dangipura (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶10

Mangilal S/o Ratanlal, R/o Khakragujran Police Station Dangipura District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶11

Dola S/o Heeralal, R/o Khakragujran Police Station Dangipura District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶12

Rambabu, R/o Khakragujran Police Station Dangipura District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶13

Smt. Rekhabai, R/o Khakragujran Police Station Dangipura District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶14

Smt. Shaitanbai, R/o Khakragujran Police Station Dangipura District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶15

Smt. Mamtabai, R/o Khakragujran Police Station Dangipura District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For : Mr. Babulal Nasuna, PP Respondent(s)

¶18

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

[CRLMB-16142/2023]

[2024:RJ-JP:3367]

(2 of 3)

Judgment / Order

19/01/2024

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&nkaxhiqjk] >kykokM esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 286@23 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 143] 452] 307] 504] 506 Hkk-na-la- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶25

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa] mUgsa feF;k :i ls vkfyIr fd;k x;k gS] vfHk;qDrx.k yEcs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] egRoiw.kZ vuqla/kku iw.kZ gks pqdk gS] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶26

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶27

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶28

vfHk;qDrx.k ij vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj vkgr ij tkuysok geyk dkfjr djus dk vkjksi gS] vkgr ekaxhyky ds 'kjhj ij izk.k?kkrd pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gSa] ekaxhyky }kjk ;s pksVsa vU; vfHk;qDr dsnkj] jkeizlkn }kjk dkfjr djuk crk;k gS] bl izdkj orZeku vfHk;qDrx.k dk ekeyk muls fHkUu gS] orZeku vfHk;qDrx.k dk iwoZorhZ vkijkf/kd fjdkMZ ugha gS] vfHk;qDrx.k fnukad 10-12-23 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSaA

¶29

[2024:RJ-JP:3367]

¶30

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-16142/2023]

¶31

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶32

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr 1- Hkkjrflag] 2- fo".kq dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mUgsa cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq izR;sd }kjk ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkosa rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶33

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶34

Mittal /45

Bharatsingh S/O Bhonilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharatsingh S/O Bhonilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkumar Gurjar S/O Shri Kajodmal Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Pradeep Kumar S/O Ramsharan Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod @ Dhonu S/O Sh Rajendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Manbhar Devi W/O Sanwarlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Alok Singh S/O Shri Malkhan Singh Rajput Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul S/O Yogendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan