Allowed

Vinod S/O Shri Shankar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Dec 2024CRLMB/15883/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. The court held that the matter is exclusively triable by a Magistrate and anticipated a long trial, thereby enlarging the accused on personal bond with sureties without commenting on merits.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial Judge.

Vinod S/O Shri Shankar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Arbitration | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:51680]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15883/2024

¶4

Vinod S/o Shri Shankar Lal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Bodal, Police Staiton Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sawaimadhopur)

¶5

Golu S/o Shri Bhairulal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bodal, Police Staiton Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sawaimadhopur)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

¶12

Order

¶13

16/12/2024

¶14

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 330/2024 registered at Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2) & 61(2)(b) of B.N.S. and Section 66D of I.T. Act.

¶15

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time,

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JP:51680]

[CRLMB-15883/2024]

therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

¶21

Heard and perused the material available on record.

¶22

Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

¶23

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely:

¶24

1. Vinod S/o Shri Shankar Lal & 2. Golu S/o Shri Bhairulal

¶25

in connection with FIR No. 330/2024 registered at Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶26

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶27

Keshav/222

Vinod S/O Shri Shankar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod S/O Shri Shankar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitesh Paliwal S/O Shri Anand Bihari Paliwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Robin S/O Kamru Vs State of Rajasthan

Praveen Kumar @ Montu S/O Late Shri Kishan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Golu @ Thansingh S/O Kamal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kanhiram @ Kanhaiya S/O Lalu @ Lala Vs State of Rajasthan

Gopal Devda S/O Bhuuwanilal @ Bhuwanilal Vs State of Rajasthan