Allowed

Amit Sutradhar S/O Anjan Sutradhar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Jun 2024CRLMB/15729/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench order granting bail to the petitioner. The petitioner is in judicial remand for nearly three years, yet only two hearing dates have occurred with no charge sheet filed. Due to the excessive delay, the court subjected to Section 436 CrPC and granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the petitioner for appearance before the Court of Sessions for First Session.释放.

Amit Sutradhar S/O Anjan Sutradhar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:26393]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15729/2023

¶4

Amit Sutradhar S/o Anjan Sutradhar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Malpota, Marigaon Police Station Marigaon, District Marigaon (Assam). (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Khetri)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar Mr. P.L. Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ( V. J. )

¶11

Order

¶12

03/06/2024

¶13

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk&439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds rgr U;k;ky; fof’k"V U;k;k/kh’k] Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu% izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e ¼vij ls’ku U;k;k/kh’k½ [ksrMh] jktLFkku }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 31-07-2023 ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA ftlds }kjk fo}ku fof’k"V U;k;k/kh’k] Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu% izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e ¼vij ls’ku U;k;k/kh’k½ [ksrMh] jktLFkku us izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&109@2022] iqfyl Fkkuk ipsjhdyka] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@20] 8@29 Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu% izHkkoh vf/kfu;e] 1985 esa vfHk;qDr vfer lq=/kkj iq= vatu lq=/kkj dk tekur izkFkZuk&i= [kkfjt dj fn;kA

¶14

nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ jgk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl ekeys esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds dCts ls dfFkr :i ls 55 fdyksxzke xkatk cjken gksuk crk;k x;k gSA izdj.k esa /kkjk 52&, ,uMhih,l ,DV ds izko/kkuksa dh ikyuk ugha dh xbZ gSA eqyfte dks fnukad 23-07-2022 dks fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k Fkk] rc ls og

[2024:RJ-JP:26393]

[CRLMB-15729/2023]

(2 of 3)

U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA izdj.k esa fopkj.k ds nkSjku vHkh rd dsoy nks xokgksa ds c;ku ys[kc) gq, gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa vHkh le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA eqyfte ds f[kykQ ,uMhih,l ,DV ds rgr vU; dksbZ eqdnek iathc) ugha gqvk gSA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fuEu lEEkkfur U;kf;d n`"VkUr izLrqr fd, x;s%&

¶20

Rajib Dey Vs. The State of West Bengal, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8895/2022.

¶21

Shariful Islam @ Sarif Vs. The State of West Bengal, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 4173/2022.

¶22

Suraj Gupta Vs. Central Narcotics Bureau, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 11719/2023.

¶23

Rahul SK & Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal, Criminal Appeal No. 3571/2023 (@ Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 11472/2023).

¶24

Devendra Kumar Mishra @ Bade Guru Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.14639/2023.

¶25

Afarul SK & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 11545/2023.

¶26

Amrita Halder Vs. The State of West Bengal, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 12911/2023.

¶27

Alim SK Vs. The State of West Bengal, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 15179/2023.

¶28

Rased Mia Vs. The State of West Bengal, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 14347/2023.

¶29

Najrul Islam @ Najbul Hoque Vs. The State of West Bengal, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No (s). 14172/2023.

[2024:RJ-JP:26393]

[CRLMB-15729/2023]

(3 of 3)

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds tekur vkosnu&i= dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶34

nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA mHk; i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh ,oa izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶35

izdj.k esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 23-07-2022 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk eas gSA izdj.k esa eqyfte ls 55 fdyksxzke xkatk cjken fd, tkus dk ekeyk crk;k x;k gSA xkats dh O;olkf;d ek=k 20 fdyksxzke gSA fdUrq izkFkhZ&eqyfte yxHkx 23 ekg ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSA fopkj.k ds nkSjku dsoy ek= nks xokgksa ds c;ku ys[kc) fd, tk pqds gS ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa vHkh le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶36

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vfer lq=/kkj iq= vatu lq=/kkj dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&109@2022] iqfyl Fkkuk ipsjhdyka] [ksrMh] ftyk >qa>quw esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk iPphl&iPphl :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks vknsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd og fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk fu;r frfFk;ksa ij o tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tkos] U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksxkA

¶37

[ASHUTOSH KUMAR ( V. J.)], J

¶38

Badal /5

Amit Sutradhar S/O Anjan Sutradhar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Sutradhar S/O Anjan Sutradhar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devraj S/O Ramsingh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Hanuman S/O Moti Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar S/O Shri Ramprasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Bala Devi W/O Late Vikram Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jitendra Sarawag S/O Sh. Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh S/O Shri Kajod Vs State of Rajasthan