Allowed

Aditya Singh S/O Sh. Rajendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Dec 2024CRLMB/15641/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jaipur granted anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner in an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with an FIR registered for offences under the BNS, 2023. The Court imposed standard conditions for bail.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail on a personal bond of Rupees one lakh with two sureties of Rupees fifty thousand each on specified conditions.

Aditya Singh S/O Sh. Rajendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:52619]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15641/2024

¶4

Aditya Singh S/o Sh. Rajendra Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o In Front Of Shastri Park, Phir Pada, Nasiya Colony, Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur, Raj.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Pandely For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶11

Order

¶12

20/12/2024

¶13

The accused-petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.543/2024 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur City (East) for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 307, 134, 324(4) & 324(5) of the BNS, 2023, the petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS.

¶14

Heard.

¶15

Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record.

¶16

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that the injuries sustained by the complainant party are simple in nature, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, deems just and

[CRLMB-15641/2024]

[2024:RJ-JP:52619]

(2 of 2)

proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accusedpetitioner.

¶21

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Aditya Singh S/o Shri Rajendra Singh, in connection with the aforesaid FIR shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶24

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶26

Ashish Kumar /451

Aditya Singh S/O Sh. Rajendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aditya Singh S/O Sh. Rajendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghuveer Son of Laxminarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishal S/O Dharmpal Vs State of Rajasthan

Umardeen S/O Saddik Vs State of Rajasthan

Sahdev Son of Shri Moolchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Naresh Kumar Meena S/O Shri Ramesh Chand Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Sohail S/O Saleem Vs State of Rajasthan