Court dismissed second bail application in NDPS trial. Held that filing charge-sheet is not a substantial change of circumstance sufficient to grant fresh bail after earlier dismissal.
Bail application dismissed citing lack of substantial change in circumstances post-previous dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:52325]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 15298/2024
Naresh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ramesh Chand Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 66 K, Odhandha, Tehsil Hindoli, District Bundi, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohan Shaktawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia- PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
20/12/2024
(2 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:52325]
[CRLMB-15298/2024]
contraband. It is also submitted that the seized contraband is marginally more than the commercial quantity as stipulated under law.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-15298/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:52325]
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
NEERU/15
3 issues framed by the court
Whether filing of a charge-sheet constitutes a substantial change of circumstance to justify a fresh bail application dismissed earlier on similar grounds.
Whether non-compliance with Section 52-A of the NDPS Act and non-implication of independent witness are new grounds for bail.
Whether the quantum of seized contraband being marginally above commercial quantity warrants bail.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shakti Gurjar Vs. State & Anr.Relied on¶24
Shakti Gurjar Vs. State & Anr.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Naresh Kumar Meena
State Of Rajasthan
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
