Allowed

Anoop Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Feb 2024CRLMB/1379/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 439 CrPC by an accused in FIR No. 443/2023 of Chunabhati police station for offences under Sections 454, 380 and 120-B IPC. Co-accused had already been granted bail. The court granted bail subject to furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Anoop Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:6433]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1379/2024

¶4

Anoop Singh S/o Bhrigunarayan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ligh4, Chunabhati Police Station Chunabhati, Dist. Bhopal, M.p. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Bhilwara)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Sikander Khan
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. S.K. Bhati,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

07/02/2024

¶13

01izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk] iqfyl Fkkuk dksrokyh HkhyokM+k] ftyk HkhyokM+k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 443@2023] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 454] 380] 120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds ekeys esa tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr gqvk gSA

¶14

02cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶15

03izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dh vksj ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl izdj.k esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA bl ekeys esa lgvfHk;qDr vfer dh tekur S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 504/2024, Order Dated 29-01-2024 ds }kjk o lgvfHk;qDr jkds'k dh tekur S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15180/2023, Order Dated 13-12-2023 ds }kjk bl U;k;ky; }kjk yh tk pqdh gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk lgvfHk;qDr ls fHkUu izd`fr dk ugha gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dkQh le; ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-1379/2024]

[2024:RJ-JD:6433]

04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr tekur vkosnu i= dk l[r fojks/k djrs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds tekur vkosnu i= dks [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶20

05eSaus mi;qZDr rdkZsa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶21

06cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

07ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vuwi flag iq= fHkxzqukjk;.k ¼fHkzxqukjk;.k½ iqfyl Fkkuk dksrokyh HkhyokM+k] ftyk HkhyokM+k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 443@2023 ds ekeys esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶23

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶24

184-mayank/-

Anoop Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anoop Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishanlal Vs Narulal

Rachna Khushi Vs Narendra Kumar

Kalyan Singh S/O Shri Dungar Singh Vs Dhaap Kanwar

Nirmala Devi Vs Virendra Kumar

United India Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs Smt Parvati Devi and Ors.

Asraf Khan Vs State of Rajasthan