Kishanlal v. Narulal
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a one-line order. The court held that the notice under Section 139 of NI Act is specifically directed for the dishonour of a cheque and cannot be issued on a basis of offering false information.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:6018]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 19/2024
- Kishanlal S/o Shri Payarchand Sanadhya, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Rajyawas Tehsil And Dist Rajsamand (Raj)
- Puran S/o Shri Kishanlal Sanadhya, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Rajyawas Tehsil And Dist Rajsamand (Raj)
- Rekha W/o Shri Puran Sanadhya, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Rajyawas Tehsil And Dist Rajsamand (Raj)
----Petitioners
Versus
- Narulal S/o Heera Ji Regar, R/o Rajyawas Tehsil And Dist Rajsamand (Raj)
- Assistant Engineer Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Rajyawas Tehsil And Dist Rajsamand (Raj)
- Assistant Engineer Public Health Engineerinf Department, Rajyawas Tehsil And Dist Rajsamand (Raj)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kishanlal S/o Shri Payarchand Sanadhya
- petitioner
Puran S/o Shri Kishanlal Sanadhya
- petitioner
Rekha W/o Shri Puran Sanadhya
- respondent
Narulal S/o Heera Ji Regar
- respondent
Assistant Engineer Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/19/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court