Allowed

Durgpal S/O Aadiram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Mar 2024CRLMB/1375/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1375/2024, this Court allowed the bail application of the accused petitioner charged with offences under Sections 323, 341, 504, 307, and 34 IPC. The Court deemed it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail without expressing any opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed; petitioner to be released on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each before the trial Court.

Durgpal S/O Aadiram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:14078]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

1375/2024

¶5

Durgpal S/o Aadiram, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Ekata Police Station Baseri District Dholpur. (Accused Petitioner In Judicial Custody In District Jail, Jaipur).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain, Adv. For : Mr. Yashwant Kankhediya, P.P. Respondent(s) Mr. Jagmohan Bhardwaj, Adv.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

20/03/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.574/2023 registered at Police Station Baseri, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 323, 341, 504, 307, 34 of IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial

¶15

[2024:RJ-JP:14078]

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-1375/2024]

¶17

custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State as well as learned counsel for complainant has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Durgpal S/o Aadiram shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

YOGESH KUMAR /126

Durgpal S/O Aadiram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Durgpal S/O Aadiram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahrukh Khan @ Saruk S/O Shri Jaleb Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Satish S/O Maganram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Anju W/O Sanjay Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Narendra Bairwa S/O Shri Gopal Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal Kishor @ Lala S/O Kaduram @ Kaluram Vs State of Rajasthan

Parmanand S/O Gendilal Vs the State of Rajasthan