Dismissed

Shahrukh Khan @ Saruk S/O Shri Jaleb Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Mar 2024CRLMB/652/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petitioner's request for bail. The court noted that the petitioner was an accused in cases of attempt to murder and consensual non-consensual sexual assault. After considering the facts, circumstances, and judicial record, the application was dismissed due to its temporary nature.

What the court decided

AI extract

Shahrukh Khan @ Saruk S/O Shri Jaleb Khan Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:13792]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

652/2024

¶5

Shahrukh Khan @ Saruk S/o Shri Jaleb Khan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Beri Nisfi Sohna, 9 Mewat, Police Station Tavad, District Nooh (Haryana).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman, Adv. For : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

19/03/2024

¶14

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk izkFkhZ dks iqfyl Fkkuk ulhjkckn lnj] vtesj ij iathc) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 353@22 varxZr /kkjk 407] 461] 120ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa vfxze tekur fn;s tkus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶15

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZ funksZ"k gS] mlls dksbZ cjkenxh ugha gksuh gS] lg vfHk;qDr dh bRryk ds vk/kkj ij vfHk;qDr dks vkjksfir vijk/k ls ugha tksMk tk ldrk] vU; dksbZ lk{; i=koyh ij ugha gS] dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk ugha gS] vfHk;qDr dks vdkj.k

[CRLMB-652/2024]

[2024:RJ-JP:13792]

(2 of 3)

fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k rks mlds fof/kd vf/kdkjksa dk guu gksxk] vr% vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶20

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, vfxze tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶21

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶22

gLrxr ekeys esa ifjoknh jfoUnz }kjk ntZ djk;h x;h izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ o vuqla/kku ds vuqlkj ;g vkjksi gS fd ifjoknh }kjk VªkaliksVsZ'ku gsrq bysDVªkfud lkeku o ?kjsyw lkeku Vªd uacj ,e,p 47 a,l 5611 ds ek/;e ls jokuk fd;k Fkk ftl ij pkyd 'ksj[kku o lg;ksxh 'kkgwu FkkA jkLrs esa mijksDr dUVsuj esa j[ks ysiVkWi o vU; lkeku ftldh vuqekfur dher 11]43]865@&:i;s Fkh daVsuj dh lhy rksMdj pqjk fy;s ftlesa 'kkg:[k dk lg;ksx jgkA

¶23

lg vfHk;qDr dh bRryk ds vk/kkj ij dkWy fMVsYl vkfn izkIr dh x;h ftlls vfHk;qDr@izkFkhZ dh Hkwfedk bl vijk/k esa izdV gks jgh gSA vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iqfyl us vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ekeyk izekf.kr ekurs gq, vfHk;qDr ds Qjkj gksus ls /kkjk 37 iqfyl ,DV ds rgr U;k;ky; ls okj.V izkIr dj j[kk gSA

¶24

izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] vijk/k dh izd`fr ,oa xaHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds bl izdze ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ dh

¶25

vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA

¶26

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ 'kkg:[k [kku mQZ 'kk:d iq= tysc [kku dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶27

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶28

Murari Lal Sharma /294

Shahrukh Khan @ Saruk S/O Shri Jaleb Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Shahrukh Khan @ Saruk S/O Shri Jaleb Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lekhraj S/O Sopal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjeev Bhardwaj S/O Shri Tilakraj Bhardwaj, Vs Brij Mohan S/O Kalu Lal

Vikram Meena S/O Babulal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Satish S/O Maganram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Anju W/O Sanjay Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sanjay Kumar S/O Suresh Chand Vs the State of Rajasthan