Allowed

Vinod Kumar S/O Ramdayal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Feb 2024CRLMB/1221/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application of an accused in an NDPS case, noting the recovered contraband was below commercial quantity, co-accords were already on bail, and trial conclusion was delayed. Bail was granted with personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to petitioner Vinod Kumar subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Vinod Kumar S/O Ramdayal Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:7028]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1221/2024

¶4

Vinod Kumar S/o Ramdayal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ishaaqpur, Police Station Afjalpur, District Mandsaur (M.p.) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail At Bhawani Mandi).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order

¶11

12/02/2024

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.61/2021 Registered at Police Station Mishroli, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 8/15, 8/29 of NDPS Act (later on offence under Sections 8/15, 8/25 and 8/29 of NDPS Act was found to have been made out).

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 18.01.2024. Petitioner was made an accused on the basis of statement of the co-accused. Recovered contraband article is below commercial quantity. Similarly situated co-accused Ambaram and Hanuman have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 26.08.2021 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JP:7028]

[CRLMB-1221/2024]

Application No.13612/2021. Conclusion of trial may take long time. Hence, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the

¶20

parties and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Vinod Kumar S/o Ramdayal be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he will appear before the trial court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶23

Jatin /08

Vinod Kumar S/O Ramdayal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar S/O Ramdayal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Juvenile in Conflict With Law S/O Shri Badri Prasad Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Hakikat @ Dk S/O Lalsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Harun Khan S/O Isak Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamla W/O Ashok Kumar Vs Mahaveer S/O Prabhati Lal

Munna Ali S/O Shakoor Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Hazra Bano W/O Abdul Wahid Mansoori Vs Nizamuddin Mansoori S/O Late Shri Tofa Khan Alias Mahamood Khan