Justice Uma Shanker Vyas allowed the bail application filed by Anurag Vishavkarma under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S., releasing him on bail after considering the facts without expressing opinion on merits.
Petitioner released on bail by furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:42266]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
12182/2024
Anurag Vishavkarma S/o Ramprasad Vishavkarma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Ld Colony, Scaive Apartment, Front Of 301, Bhola Kheda, Lucknow, Utterpradesh At Present R/o C-1/24 Sector-O, Second Floor, Mansarovar Yojna, Saheed Panth Transport Nagar, Ld Colony, Lucknow, Utterpradesh. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Anoop Kumar, Adv. For : Mr. Devi Singh, P.P. Respondent(s) Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 08/10/2024
This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR No.285/2023 registered at Police Station Malarna Doongar, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been
[2024:RJ-JP:42266]
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-12182/2024]
falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State as well as learned counsel for complainant has opposed the bail application.
Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Anurag Vishavkarma S/o Ramprasad Vishavkarma shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
YOGESH KUMAR /11
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail pending trial given the long period of judicial custody.
What are the conditions for granting regular bail in the instant bail application?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anurag Vishavkarma
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
