Allowed

Dinesh Meena S/O Shree Badrinaryan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Oct 2024CRLMB/12089/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second regular bail application in FIR for offences including attempt to culpable homicide and robbery; charge sheet filed and first application was withdrawn. Court allowed the bail without commenting on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail: personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, subject to appearing before the trial court on hearing dates.

Dinesh Meena S/O Shree Badrinaryan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:42228]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 12089/2024

¶4

Dinesh Meena S/o Shree Badrinaryan, R/o Eyarlipura, Meena Ki Dhani, Shivdaspura P.s. Shivdaspura, District Jaipur South. (At Present In Central Jail Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Adv. For : Mr. Devi Singh, P.P.

¶10

Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 08/10/2024

¶12

This second bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 of B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR No.245/2024 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 323, 341, 308, 394 & 34 IPC.

¶13

The first bail application of the accusedpetitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 28.08.2024, giving liberty to the accused-petitioner to file afresh after filing of the charge sheet.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been

[2024:RJ-JP:42228]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-12089/2024]

falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that charge sheet has been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that charge sheet has been filed, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Dinesh Meena S/o Shree Badrinaryan shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

DANISH USMANI /371

Dinesh Meena S/O Shree Badrinaryan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Meena S/O Shree Badrinaryan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Suman Devi and Ors. Vs Baldev and Anr.

Ganesh Narayan Vs Baldev and Anr.

Kalu Ram Sharma Vs Baldev and Anr.

Anurag Vishavkarma S/O Ramprasad Vishavkarma Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas S/O Harimohan @ Hariman Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu Singh Vs Surendra Kumar and Ors.