Allowed

Chensingh @ Chenya S/O Jagdish Prasad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Sept 2024CRLMB/11626/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in an offense triable by a First Class Magistrate, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case, directing release subject to bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Accused petitioner released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Chensingh @ Chenya S/O Jagdish Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:40302]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11626/2024

¶4

Chensingh @ Chenya S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Keeratpura, Police Station Malarna Doongar, At Present R/o Kiradi, Lalsot. (At Present Confined In Dist. Jail Dausa).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶11

Order

¶12

23/09/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 395/2024 registered at Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa for offence u/S 303(2) BNS.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the Public Prosecutor.

¶15

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused petitioner is in custody since 02.08.2024 and the offence alleged against the accused petitioner is triable by First Class Magistrate.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶17

Taking into consideration the allegations against the accusedpetitioner so also the fact that the accused petitioner is in custody

[2024:RJ-JP:40302]

[CRLMB-11626/2024]

(2 of 2)

since 02.08.2024 and the offence alleged against the him is triable by First Class Magistrate, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶24

GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /81

Chensingh @ Chenya S/O Jagdish Prasad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chensingh @ Chenya S/O Jagdish Prasad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lokesh Kumar S/O Ratan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Santram Dayma S/O Kanhaiya Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Akshay Kumar S/O Bani Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kapil Kumar S/O Sadan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Aavid S/O Jabbar Vs State of Rajasthan

Munfed @ Buggi Son of Sardara Khan Vs State of Rajasthan