Allowed

Lokesh S/O Sh. Bharat Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Oct 2024CRLMB/11602/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second regular bail application under Section 439 CrPC for offences including Section 307 IPC arising from FIR No.238/2023. The court, without expressing any opinion on merits, allowed the application and enlarged the petitioner on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to appear before the trial court on all dates.

Lokesh S/O Sh. Bharat Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:42516]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No.

¶4

11602/2024

¶5

Lokesh S/o Sh. Bharat Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Tindu, Presently Lives At Shastri Nagar, Police Station Mantown, Sawaimadhopur. (Presently Confined In Distt. Jail, Sawaimadhopur).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Joshi, Adv. For : Mr. Devi Singh, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 09/10/2024

¶12

This second bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 of B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR No.238/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawaimadhopur, District Sawaimadhopur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 323, 341, 325, 427, 307 & 34 IPC.

¶13

The first bail application of the accusedpetitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 28.08.2024, giving liberty to the accused-petitioner to file afresh after filing of the charge sheet.

[2024:RJ-JP:42516]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-11602/2024]

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Lokesh S/o Sh. Bharat Lal shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

DANISH USMANI /39

Lokesh S/O Sh. Bharat Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lokesh S/O Sh. Bharat Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Singh Vs Surendra Kumar and Ors.

Vikram Kumar Dhanka Vs Surendra Kumar and Ors.

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Harishankar Sharma Andors

Smt. Rekha Sharma S/O Late Shri Tejprakash Sharma Vs Khalil Ahmed S/O Shri Rashid Khan

Krishna Devi W/O Shri Radhey Shyam Vs Kalu Ram S/O Jita Ram

Jabra Ram S/O Shri Mada Ram, Vs the State of Rajasthan