The Court allowed the regular bail application, considering the significant period of pre-trial detention, the occurrence of investigation, and the nature of charges, while imposing conditions of surety and bonds.
Regular bail granted subject to execution of personal bond and furnishing sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:35915]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10483/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Adv For : Mr. Devi Singh, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
28/08/2024
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr ;g tekur vkosnu iqfyl Fkkuk&dkuksrk] t;iqj 'kgj iwoZ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 245@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 341] 382 Hkk-na-la- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk fuosnu gS fd izdj.k esa vkjksi i= is'k gksus ds i'pkr iqu% uohu tekur
[2024:RJ-JP:35915]
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-10483/2024]
vkosnu is'k djus dh Lora=rk ds lkFk bl LVst ij vfHk;qDr dze&1 fnus'k eh.kk ds laca/k esa bl tekur vkosnu dks okfil ysuk pkgrs gSaA
rnuqlkj vfHk;qDr fnus'k eh.kk ds l a ca/k eas izLrqr tekur vkosnu okfil fy;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
tgka rd vfHk;qDr jkeds'k mQZ ckcwyky dk iz'u gS] bl laca/k esa vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] yacs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] egRoiw.kZ vuqla/kku gks pqdk gS] vr% mls tekur dh lqfo/kk iznku fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA
izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr jkeds'k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr jkeds'k mQZ ckcwyky eh.kk iq= dkukjke eh.kk dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl
[2024:RJ-JP:35915]
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-10483/2024]
gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
MANISH SAINI /23
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to regular bail in view of their pre-trial detention?
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Dinesh Meena
Ramkesh @ Babu Lal Meena
State Of Rajasthan
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
