Allowed

Pushkar Singh S/O Murli Ram, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC27 Aug 2024CRLMB/10439/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application by the accused arrested in a FIR registered at Reengus police station for offences including robbery and attempt to murder, with cross-FIRs between the parties. The High Court granted bail on furnishing a bond of one lakh rupees with two sureties of fifty thousand rupees each.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, with undertaking to appear on all court dates.

Pushkar Singh S/O Murli Ram, Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:35816]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10439/2024

¶4

Pushkar Singh S/o Murli Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Laakhni, Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail, Sikar)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.D.S. Naruka, Adv For : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Respondent(s) Mr. K.S. Loha, Adv

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶11

27/08/2024

¶12

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk &jhaxl] lhdj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &666@2023 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 341] 323] 307] 394] 506] 34 Hkk-na-la- rFkk 3] 25] 27 vk;q/k vf/kfu;e esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] jktuSfrd jaft'ko'k feF;k vkjksi yxk;k x;k gS] vfHk;qDr fnukad 12-08-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku 'ks"k ugh gS] dkfjr lHkh pksVsa lk/kkj.k o rqPN izd`fr dh gSa] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

[CRLMB-10439/2024]

[2024:RJ-JP:35816]

(2 of 2)

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶18

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶19

orZeku ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij ;g vkjksi gS fd ifjoknh lkslk;Vh dk fjdkWMZ ysdj tk jgk Fkk] rc vfHk;qDr us lgvfHk;qDr ds lkFk feydj fiLrkSy fn[kkdj ekjihV djrs gq, lkslk;Vh dk fjdkWMZ o nks yk[k :i;s Nhu fy;s] pksV izfrosnu ds vuqlkj pksV lk/kkj.k o rqPN izd`fr dh gSa] nksuksa i{kksa ds e/; ijLij fojks/kh ,Q-vkbZ-vkj- ntZ gqbZ gSaA

¶20

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶21

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr iq"dj flag iq= eqjyhjke dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

MANISH SAINI /14

Pushkar Singh S/O Murli Ram, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushkar Singh S/O Murli Ram, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaivardhan Khandelwal S/O Shri Ramavatar Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan

Chauthmal Son of Badri Lal, Vs Rajneesh Son of Shri Shishpal Chamar

Smt Suman Devi and Ors. Vs Shankar Lal Pareek and Ors.

Vikram Singh S/O Daulatram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Ankur S/O Chhitarlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Kumar Gurjar Son of Laduram Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan