Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS in an FIR under Sections 3/25 Arms Act. The court noted absence of independent witness for the recovery, petitioner's acquittal in two prior cases, long custody and likely trial delay, and allowed bail subject to bond.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:35799]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10373/2024
Raghunath S/o Shri Hetram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Bada Mohalla Raja Mandi, Kasba Bhusawar, Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Bharatpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandra Mohan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
27/08/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:35799]
[CRLMB-10373/2024]
merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release petitioner on bail.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN /7
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused should be granted bail under Section 483 BNSS in an Arms Act case where there was no independent witness to the weapon recovery.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Raghunath S/o Shri Hetram
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
