The Rajasthan High Court rejected the petitioner's third bail application in a murder conspiracy case. The bench held the gravity of the offence and CCTV evidence made the petitioner ineligible for bail, dismissing the application.
Petitioner's third bail application dismissed; bail not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 10248/2024
Vikram @ Vikki S/o Shankar Singh, R/o Dev Nagar, Chang, P.s. Sandada, District Pali, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Ajmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
18/09/2024
[CRLMB-10248/2024]
(2 of 2)
was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that statements of PW-1 Bhupendra Singh, PW-7 Rameshchand Nagora and PW-8 Sonu Kathat have been recorded by the trial court in which they have not supported the prosecution story. Conclusion of trial may take long time. So, the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Gourav/29
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is fit to be enlarged on bail given the gravity of offence of murder and conspiracy.
Whether CCTV evidence placing petitioner with co-accused precludes bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikram @ Vikki
State Of Rajasthan
Neera Khan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
