Allowed

Vishnu Vishnoi S/O Sangram Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Sept 2024CRLMB/10247/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 483 BNSS by an NDPS accused who had previously been granted bail but was arrested after forfeiture of bail bonds for non-appearance. Court enlarged him on bail on a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Accused released on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, to appear on all hearing dates.

Vishnu Vishnoi S/O Sangram Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:37331]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10247/2024

¶4

Vishnu Vishnoi S/o Sangram Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Surta Nagar Khudala, Police Station Jhanwar, District Jodhpur. (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Order

¶12

05/09/2024

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of the accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of FIR No. 541/2022, registered at Police Station Bagru, District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 8/18 & 8/25 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence(s). Counsel further submits that the petitioner was granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 27.01.2023. Later on, he was directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 30.05.2023 but due to his absence, his bail bonds were forfeited and arrest warrant was issued & he was produced before the learned Trial Court by Production Warrant. Presently, he is behind the bars since 31.07.2024. The petitioner

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JP:37331]

[CRLMB-10247/2024]

is no more required for any custodial interrogation. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶21

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶22

Therefore, the bail application is allowed . Accused-petitioner namely Vishnu Vishnoi S/o Sangram Ram, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.

¶23

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶24

SAHIL SONI/11

Vishnu Vishnoi S/O Sangram Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishnu Vishnoi S/O Sangram Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Waseem Hashmi S/O Sh. Taki Hashmi Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaipur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs Abid Hussain

Jagdish S/O Chhitarlal Vs Nenga S/O Bhagchand

Alimuddin Qureshi S/O Rafikuddin Qureshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Gocher @ Anil Gurjar @ Annu Gurjar S/O Ganesh Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishram @ Vikram S/O Pooransingh Vs State of Rajasthan