Allowed

Haluka @ Jajjodhan S/O Shri Harisingh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Sept 2024CRLMB/10137/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail to the petitioner, an accused in judicial custody at Dholpur Jail, held to be fit to receive bail under Section 483 CrPC. The court dismissed the state's submission regarding the accused's conduct towards his sister.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed to the petitioner in custody; directed to produce before Sessions Court for further hearing.

Haluka @ Jajjodhan S/O Shri Harisingh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:38094]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

10137/2024

¶5

Haluka @ Jajjodhan S/o Shri Harisingh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Maanpur, Police Station Kolari, Dholpur Presently R/o Raja Bihar Colony Odela Road Dholpur Police Station Nihalganj Dholpur. (Accused Petitioner In Judicial Custody In District Jail Dholpur).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain, Adv. For : Mr. Devisingh, PP Respondent(s) Mr. Ankush Sharma, Adv.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

09/09/2024

¶14

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= ch-,u-,u-,l- dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr efgyk iqfyl Fkkuk &/kkSyiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &215@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 70¼1½] 303¼2½] 137¼2½] 126¼2½] 87] 333] 125] 115¼2½ ch-,u-,l- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶15

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] og ihfMrk dk HkkbZ gS] eq[; vfHk;qDr QkSth] vfHk;qDr dk cguksbZ gS] ifr&iRuh ds fookn dks ysdj

¶16

[2024:RJ-JP:38094]

¶17

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-10137/2024]

¶18

feF;k vkjksi.k fd;k x;k gS] ihfMrk }kjk iqfyl o eftLVªsV ds le{k fn;s x;s dFkuksa esa vfHk;qDr d fo:) dksbZ vkjksi ugha yxk;k gS] og fnukad 03-08-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd rFkk vf/koDrk ihfMrk us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶20

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶21

orZeku ekeys esa 35 o"khZ; ihfMrk }kjk ;g vkjksi yxk;k gS fd mldk vius ifr QkSth ls dkQh lkyksa ls cksypky rFkk vkuk&tkuk can gS] fnukad 26-07-2024 dks QkSth o mlds lkFkh _f"k] jfo] ey[kku o 4&5 vU; O;fDr mlds ?kj ykBh&M.Ms vkfn ysdj vk;s rFkk ihfMrk dks mBkdj taxy esa ys x;s vkSj mls fuoZL= dj mlds xqIrkax esa vaxqfy;ka pyk;h] flxjsV ls pyk fn;k] mlds ifr ds lkeus vfHk;qDr _f"k us mlds lkFk nq"deZ fd;k] lksus&pkanh ds tsojkrvkfn Hkh Nhudj ys x;sA

¶22

vfHk;qDr] ihfMrk dk HkkbZ gS rFkk mlds fo:) ihfMrk }kjk dksbZ fo'ks"k vkjksi ugha yxk;s gSa] cfYd ;g vkjski gS fd QkSth dks viuh iRuh dks lkFk ys tkus gsrq lgefr nh Fkh] bl izdkj vU; vfHk;qDrx.k ls orZeku izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk iw.kZr% fHkUu gSA

¶23

[2024:RJ-JP:38094]

¶24

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-10137/2024]

¶25

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶26

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr gyqdk mQZ tTtks/ku iq= gjhflag dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶27

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶28

Mittal /356(18)

Haluka @ Jajjodhan S/O Shri Harisingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Haluka @ Jajjodhan S/O Shri Harisingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkhiladi S/O Shri Shankarlal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep S/O Sanwalram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Aasif S/O Shri Sabir Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangesh Arora S/O Shri Har Bhagwan, Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghunandan and Anr. Vs Mukesh Lodha and Ors.

Girisa @ Greesa W/O Shri Satyaveer Vs State of Rajasthan