Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur, rejecting a leave to appeal in a criminal matter deemed barred by limitation due to a 38-day delay, dismissed the application as not maintainable.
The leave to appeal is dismissed as not maintainable due to delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:16930]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 88/2024
Subhash Chandra S/o Ladhu Ram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Nimla, At Present Ward No. 15, Behind Excise P.s., Tehsil Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh.
----Appellant
Versus
Maniram S/o Samundar Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Khopada Teh. Nohar Dist. Hanumangarh.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anees Bhurat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
18/04/2024
(FARJAND ALI),J
44-Pramod/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the leave to appeal is maintainable despite a delay of 38 days without condonation.
Subhash Chandra
Maniram
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
