Dismissed

Kartar Singh v. State

Rajasthan HC16 Apr 2024CRLMP/1035/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of three criminal miscellaneous petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of an FIR. The court granted protection against arrest during investigation but directed petitioners to file for regular bail upon filing of the charge-sheet, to be decided by the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted protection against arrest during investigation; directed to file regular bail application after charge-sheet.

Kartar Singh Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:16681]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2361/2023

¶4

Laxman S/o Shri Veeru Ram, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Nayak, R/o Village 6 SKM Sakhi, Tehsil Gharsana, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶8

Pathan Khan S/o Phool Khan, Aged About 35 Years, B/c Musalman, R/o 8 SK M Abadi, P.S. Rawla, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

CONNECTED WITH

¶11

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6160/2021

¶12

Sukha @ Mukhtiyar Singh S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Aged About 37 Years, B/c Kapadiya, R/o 41 PS, Tehsil Raisinghnagar, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)

¶13

----Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Pathan Khan S/o Phool Khan, Aged About 35 Years, B/c Musalman, R/o 8 SKM Abadi, P.S. Rawla, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1035/2022

¶18

Kartar Singh S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 14 PS Raisinghnagar, District Sri Ganganagar. (Rajasthan)

¶19

----Petitioner

¶20

Versus

¶21

The State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Pathan Khan S/o Phool Khan, R/o 8 SKM, Rawla, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)

¶22

----Respondents

¶23

For Petitioners	: Mr.	Balvindra Singh
	Mr.	Ratish Bhatnagar
For Respondent No.1	: Mr.	Mahipal Bishnoi,P.P.

(2 of 3)

[2024:RJ-JD:16681]

[CRLMP-2361/2023]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

¶28

Order

¶29

16/04/2024

¶30

The instant criminal misc. petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.183/2021 registered at Police Station Rawla, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B of IPC.

¶31

Both the learned counsels for the petitioners pray for quashing the aforementioned FIR and all further proceedings in pursuant thereof.

¶32

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submission of learned counsels for the petitioners for quashing of the FIR and all further proceedings in pursuant thereof.

¶33

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the niceties of the matter, it is felt appropriate to direct that the petitioners shall not be arrested during the entire course of investigation. Instead thereof, if offence is found proved, then the Investigating Officer shall inform the petitioners to appear before the trial Court on the date of filing of charge-sheet.

¶34

On the day of filing of the charge-sheet and upon the appearance of the petitioners, they shall move a regular bail application under Section 437 of the Cr.P.C. and whereupon the learned trial Court shall release them on bail on the very same day; on the amount of surety and bond as it deems fit.

¶35

(3 of 3) [CRLMP-2361/2023]

¶36

[2024:RJ-JD:16681]

¶37

Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petitions as well as the stay petitions are disposed of.

¶38

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶39

Abhishek Kumar S.Nos.355 to 357

Kartar Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kartar Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhpal Kaur Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlesh @ Kishan Vs State of Rajasthan

Pragaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sahiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Gurdeep Singh Vs State

Pehalwan Vs Union of India