Allowed

Satyapal Singh Son of Banaisingh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Sept 2024CRLAS/2002/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Special Criminal Appeal filed seeking bail for the appellant accused of offences under IPC and SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. Special Judge's bail order quashed. Appellant released on personal bond of Rs.1 lac with two sureties of Rs.50k each.

What did the court decide?

Quashed and set aside order dated 08.08.2024. Appellant directed to be released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1 lac and two sureties of Rs.50k each subject to conditions.

Satyapal Singh Son of Banaisingh Vs State of Rajasthan — Caste Atrocities | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:38062]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2002/2024

¶4

Satyapal Singh Son Of Banaisingh, Resident Of Sutaidi Police Station Malpura District Agra (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur)

¶5

----Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

¶8

Maujilal Son Of Sukhram, Resident Of Gadhi Harjupura Tehsil Basedi, District Dholpur

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anil Jain, Adv., for Mr. Dushyant Jain, Adv.

¶11

For : Mr. Devi Singh, P.P. Respondent(s) Mr. Rajender Yadav, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sharma, Adv.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶13

09/09/2024

¶14

The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short “the Act of 1989”) has been filed in connection with FIR No.279/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Dholpur, District Dholpur for the offence under Section(s) 420, 406, 506 of IPC and under Section(s) 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the Act of 1989.

¶15

[2024:RJ-JP:38062] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-2002/2024]

¶16

It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-appellant has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence prays for his release on bail.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for complainante has opposed the appeal.

¶18

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail.

¶19

The order dated 08.08.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Dholpur (Rajasthan) is quashed and set-aside and this appeal is accordingly allowed. It is directed that accused-appellant Satyapal Singh

¶20

Son Of Banaisingh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall

¶21

[2024:RJ-JP:38062] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-2002/2024]

¶22

appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so and shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

YOGESH KUMAR /336

Satyapal Singh Son of Banaisingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyapal Singh Son of Banaisingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkhiladi S/O Shri Shankarlal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep S/O Sanwalram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Aasif S/O Shri Sabir Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangesh Arora S/O Shri Har Bhagwan, Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghunandan and Anr. Vs Mukesh Lodha and Ors.

Girisa @ Greesa W/O Shri Satyaveer Vs State of Rajasthan