Allowed

Sagar Singh Son of Shri Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Jul 2024CRLAS/1099/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court, taking into overall facts without expressing opinion on merits, held it just to enlarge the appellant on bail. The impugned order refusing bail was quashed and the appeal allowed, directing release after furnishing sureties and complying with Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

The appellant shall be released on bail by furnishing a personal bond in Rs.1,00,000/ and two sureties in Rs.50,000/ each.

Sagar Singh Son of Shri Ram Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheque Dishonour | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:29421]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1099/2024

¶4

Sagar Singh Son of Shri Ram Singh, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Kotdi Bhoi Mohalla, Purane Gurudwara Ke Pass, Gumanpura District Kota (Raj) (At Present Confined In District Jail Kota)

¶5

----Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Lokesh Son of Shri Puran Chandel, R/o Khateek Mohalla, Kotdi District Kota (Raj)

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma, Adv. For : Mr. Imran Khan, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶11

15/07/2024

¶12

Learned Public Prosecutor has apprised this Court that compliance of Section 15-A (3) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short “the Act of 1989”) has been made in the present case.

¶13

The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Act of 1989 has been filed in connection with FIR No.169/2024 registered at Police Station Gumanpura, District Kota City for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 307 & 34 of IPC and under

[2024:RJ-JP:29421]

(2 of 3)

[CRLAS-1099/2024]

Section(s) 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(v) & 3(2)(va) of the Act of 1989.

¶18

It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-appellant has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence prays for his release on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail.

¶21

The order dated 19.04.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Kota is quashed and set-aside and this appeal is accordingly allowed. It is directed that accused appellant Sagar Singh S/o Shri Ram Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to

¶22

[2024:RJ-JP:29421] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-1099/2024]

¶23

the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so and shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

¶24

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶25

DANISH USMANI /14

Sagar Singh Son of Shri Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sagar Singh Son of Shri Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramprasad Sharma S/O Shri B.L. Sharma, Vs Gajendra Singh Rathore , Karyakari Adhikari

Prahalad Singh S/O Bhoor Singh Vs Virendra Singh S/O Meharchand

Ramgopal S/O Shri Laddulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Tapan Kumar Ghosh Vs Dayashankar Dixit and Anr.

State of Rajasthan Thr Ex Er Vs M/S Bharat Construction Co.

Lokesh Kumawat S/O Shri Hanuman Prasad Kumawat Vs State of Rajasthan