Allowed

Prahalad Singh S/O Bhoor Singh v. Virendra Singh S/O Meharchand

Rajasthan HC12 Jul 2024CMA/1460/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment revisits an earlier settlement regarding motor accident compensation. The High Court, while upholding the final settlement amount, noted procedural omissions regarding the driver's age and statutory liabilities.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was allowed, and the earlier order was modified to direct a specific disbursement of Rs. 15,02,552.

Prahalad Singh S/O Bhoor Singh Vs Virendra Singh S/O… — Cheque Dishonour | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:29274]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1460/2019

¶4

Prahalad Singh S/o Bhoor Singh, Aged About 56 Years, B/c Rajput R/o Gadh Bhopji, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar Current Address Ward No. 41, Piprali Road, Sikar

¶5

Smt. Seema Kanwar W/o Prahalad Singh, Aged About 49 Years, B/c Rajput R/o Gadh Bhopji, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar Current Address Ward No. 41, Piprali Road, Sikar

¶6

----Appellants

¶7

Versus

¶8

Virendra Singh S/o Meharchand, B/c Gurjar, R/o Santhalka Tijara, Tehsil Tijara, Police Station Bhiwadi Phase-Iii, District Alwar (Driver And Owner Motor Vehicle Truck No. Hr 38 J 6843)

¶9

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, E- 8, Epip, Sitapura Industrial Area, Jaipur-302022 Through Branch Manager, Sikar (Insurance Company Of Motor Vehicle Truck No. Hr 38 J. 6843)

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Chhatrasal Singh Tanwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajdeep Rathore, Adv. for Mr. Chanderdeep Singh Jodha, Adv.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Judgment / Order

¶14

12/07/2024

¶15

[email protected] }kjk ;g vihy varxZr /kkjk 173 eksVj;ku vf/kfu;e ds rgr fo}ku eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok

¶16

(2 of 4) [CMA-1460/2019]

¶17

[2024:RJ-JP:29274]

¶18

vf/kdj.k] lhdj }kjk eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok la[;k& 665@15 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa vokMZ fnukad 10-12-18 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh x;h gSA vk{ksfir vokMZ ds ek/;e ls nkosnkjku ds iq= dh vkjksfir okgu ls nq?kZVuk gksus ds ifj.kkeLo:i e`R;q gks tkus ls v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk dqy 14]22]552@& :i;s dk vokMZ 07 izfr'kr C;kt lfgr ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] ftls vi;kZIr gksuk crkrs gq, izfrdj jkf'k c<k;s tkus dk fuosnu bl vihy ds ek/;e ls fd;k x;k gSA

¶19

vk{ksfir fu.kZ; o vokMZ ds fo:) vkjksfir okgu ds Lokeh@pkyd vFkok chek daiuh }kjk dksbZ vihy izLrqr ugha dh x;h gSA

¶20

vihykFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk fuosnu gS fd e`rd dh vk; dh x.kuk lgh :i ls ugha dh x;h gS] dalksVhZ;e dh gkfu dh en esa dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnykbZ xbZ gS] tks fof/klEer ugha gS] vr% izfrdj jkf'k esa c<ksRrjh gksus ;ksX; gS

¶21

blds foijhr izR;FkhZ@chek dEiuh dh vksj ls v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; o vokMZ dks fof/klEer gksuk crkrs gq, vihy [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶22

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶23

erd dh vk;q ?kVuk ds le; 25 o"kZ gksuk izdV gqvk gS] erd dh vk; 10 gtkj :i;s izfrekg gksuk crk;k x;k gS] ysfdu is&fLyi izn'kZ&13 dqy 12 fnu ls lacf/kr is'k dh x;h gS ftlds vuqlkj 306-83 :i;s izfrfnu e`rd dh vk; gksrh gS vkSj mlh vuqlkj x.kuk djrs gq, vkSj Hkfo"; esa vk;

[CMA-1460/2019]

[2024:RJ-JP:29274]

(3 of 4)

o`f) dk ykHk nsrs gq, izfrdj jkf'k fnyk;h x;h gS] vr% mlesa dksbZ xyrh ugha gSA

¶28

tgka rd dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu dk iz'u gS] vihykFkhx.k erd ds ekrk firk gS] vr% os nksuksa erd ds izse&Lusg vkfn ls oafpr gksus ds en esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanuram & Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130 esa ikfjr fl)kar ds vuqlkj izR;sd nkosnkj 40]000@&:i;s vFkkZr dqy 80]000@&:i; s dalksVhZ;e ds uqdlkuh ds :i esa izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gS tcfd bl en esa v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnykbZ xbZ gS] vr% 8 0]000 @&:i;s bl en esa c<ksRrjh gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶29

mijksDr foospukuqlkj v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk tks 14]22]552@&:i;s dk vokMZ ikfjr fd;k x;k gS mlds LFkku ij [email protected] 1 5]02]552@&:i;s izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSA

¶30

rn~uqlkj ;g vihy vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj vk{ksfir vokMZ dks mikUrfjr djrs gq, [email protected] ds i{k esa dqy 15]02]552@&:i;s dk vokMZ ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vihykFkhZXk.k }kjk iwoZ esa izkIr dh x;h jkf'k dks vokMZ jkf'k esa ls lek;ksftr fd;k tkdj 'ks"k jkf'k vihykFkhZx.k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ik;s tkrs gSaA

¶31

bl vkns'k ds ek/;e ls tks izfrdj jkf'k c<k;h x;h gS] ml ij Hkh vihykFkhZ] v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k esa ;kfpdk lafLFkr fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls olwyh rd 07 izfr'kr lk/kkj.k okf"kZd

¶32

[2024:RJ-JP:29274]

¶33

(4 of 4) [CMA-1460/2019]

¶34

C;kt dh nj ls C;kt izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gksxk] vk{ksfir vokMZ dh 'ks"k 'krsZa ;Fkkor jgsaxhA

¶35

v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k ;fn bl U;k;ky; dks izkIr gks j[kk gS rks vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk ykSVk;k tkosA

¶36

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶37

Murari Lal Sharma /89

Prahalad Singh S/O Bhoor Singh v. Virendra Singh S/O Meharchand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prahalad Singh S/O Bhoor Singh v. Virendra Singh S/O Meharchand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bablu @ Shanu S/O Ramkishan Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharmraj @ Dharmu @ Ramdharm S/O Shri Nagaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Lal Chand Sharma and Anr. Vs Rameshwar Kumar Saini and Ors.

Ramprasad Sharma S/O Shri B.L. Sharma, Vs Gajendra Singh Rathore , Karyakari Adhikari

Ramgopal S/O Shri Laddulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Imran @ Immi S/O Abdul Razak Vs State of Rajasthan