The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the criminal appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the scheduled dates.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:45905-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Appeal (Db) No. 92/2024
Pintu Mali S/o Pukhraj, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ruparel, Pisangan, Ajmer Rajasthan.
----Appellant
Versus
–--Accused-Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : None Present |
|---|---|
| For State | : Mr. Sudesh Saini, Addl. G.A. & |
| Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A. along | |
| with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A., | |
| Mr. Aman Kumar & Mr. Kshitiz Tiwari |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
06/11/2024
No one had put in appearance on behalf of the appellant on 06.09.2024 & 07.10.2024. Today also, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant.
Accordingly, the present Criminal Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
AMIT/79
Pintu Mali
State of Rajasthan
Kailashchand
Rameshwarlal @ Aalu
Pankaj Bhandari
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
