The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an application for correction in a writ order dated 07.03.2024, directing typographical errors to read 'respondent' instead of 'petitioners' in specific paragraphs.
Correction order dated 07.03.2024 modified to read 'respondent' in place of 'petitioners' in specified paragraphs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 194/2024
In
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1098/2024
----Applicants
Versus
Anjala Agarwal W/o Dr. R.k. Agrawal, Aged About 68 Years, R/o C/o Sh Satya Narain Gupta 68/385 Sector -06 Pratap Nagar Jaipur-302023, (Rajasthan), Retired From The Post Of Prt, K.v. No. 2, Bikaner (Rajasthan) Group-B
----Respondent
For Applicant(s) : Mr. Krishna Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Mathur
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
22/08/2024
[WMAP-194/2024]
(2 of 2)
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
HEENA/03
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (Hq)
Anjala Agarwal
Pankaj Bhandari
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
