Allowed

Chanesar Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Feb 2024CRLMB/558/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 274/2023 for offences under Sections 143, 342, 323, 325, 365, 382, 308 IPC and 3/25 Arms Act. Court granted bail on parity with co-accused Dqrqc Khan and Dakhijr Khan, subject to furnishing bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each to the satisfaction of trial court.

Chanesar Khan Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:5756]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 558/2024

¶4

Chanesar Khan S/o Shri Achar Khan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kohariyo Ki Basti, Mokhab, Sheo Police Station, District Barmer. (Confined In District Jail, Barmer)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

Hassan Khan S/o Mohammed Khan, R/o Kohariyo Ki Basti, Mokhab, Sheo Police Station, District Bhilwara.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Raj Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Rajpurohit, PP Mr. Siddharth Karwasara

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶12

Order

¶13

05/02/2024

¶14

1- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk f'ko] ftyk ckM+esj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 274@2023] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 143] 342] 323] 325] 365] 382] 308 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk o /kkjk 3@25 vk;q/k vf/kfu;e ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA

¶15

2- geus cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶16

3- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dh vksj ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd bl ekeys esa vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k dqrqc [kka o dEHkhj [kka gSa] ftudh tekur bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 11-01-2024 dks yh tk pqdh gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds leku gh gSA vr% bl vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶17

4- blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd o ;ksX; vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 us mDr tekur vkosnu i= dk fojks/k djrs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds tekur vkosnu i= dks [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

[2024:RJ-JD:5756]

[CRLMB-558/2024]

(2 of 2)

5- eSaus mi;qZDr rdkZsa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd bl ekeys esa vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k dqrqc [kka o dEHkhj [kka dh tekur bl U;k;ky; }kjk S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 250/2024 ds vkns'k fnukad 11-01-2024 ds }kjk gks pqdh gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds leku gh gSA

¶22

6- vr% cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶23

7- ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr puslj [kka iq= vkpkj [kka] iqfyl Fkkuk f'ko] ftyk ckM+esj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 274@2023 ds ekeys esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶24

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶25

212-GauravGehlot/-

Chanesar Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chanesar Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Lal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Bheru Shankar Vs State of Rajasthan

Diksha Panwar Vs State of Rajasthan

Devkinandan Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganga Singh Vs Om Prakash and Ors.

M/S Surana Computers System and Anr. Vs Vijaya Bank