The court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal as infructuous because the parties informed that an application for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act was filed before the Family Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:42941-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 86/2011
Poonam Joshi s/o Shri Satish Joshi, Resident of Lotkheri, Tehsil Bhanpura, District Mandsaur (MP)
----Appellant
Versus
Archana w/o Poonam Chand D/o Shri Shambhu Ji, Resident of Jhalawar presently Resident of 331, Basant Vihar, Kota.
----Respondent
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
10/10/2024
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Preeti Asopa /129
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil miscellaneous appeal remains viable when a mutual consent divorce petition is pending before the Family Court?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Poonam Joshi
Archana
Pankaj Bhandari
Bhuvan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
