Appeal against an ad-interim status quo order in a property dispute. With construction completed and counsels consenting, the court made the earlier interim order (permitting construction per Municipal Council permission) absolute and directed the trial court to decide the Order 39 application within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:744]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 649/2023
----Appellants
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. C.S. Kotwani For Respondent(s) : Mr. L.D. Khatri
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order
05/01/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:744]
[CMA-649/2023]
(2 of 2)
claim any right qua the constructed area. Further, the parties were restrained from alienating the property.
(REKHA BORANA),J
70-T.Singh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim order permitting construction should be made absolute pending decision on the injunction application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tarachand
Govindram
Dinesh
Deepak
Sunil
Jitender
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
