Civil misc. appeal against an interim injunction restraining a defendant from interfering with plaintiff's mining activities. Appeal disposed with direction to trial court to decide the temporary injunction application within four months, status quo on mining maintained till then.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:475]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1706/2023
Jayram S/o Shri Chothuram, Aged About 74 Years, By Caste Gurjar, Resident Of Village Bidiyad, Tehsil Parbatsar District Didwana-Kuchaman.
----Appellant
Versus
Janki Devi D/o Shri Boduram, By Caste Mali, Resident Of Village Bidiyad, Tehsil Parbatsar District Didwana-Kuchaman.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Prashant Tatia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajeev Purohit
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
04/01/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:475]
[CMA-1706/2023]
(2 of 2)
be an order staying the further proceedings. Learned counsel submits that the present appeal be disposed of while making the interim order dated 12.10.2023 absolute and the Court below be directed to proceed with the further proceedings and to decide the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2, CPC
Till the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2,CPC is decided by the Court below, both the parties shall maintain status quo regarding the mining activities.
(REKHA BORANA),J
81-devanshi/vij/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim stay of the injunction order should be made absolute while the Court below decides the Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jayram
Janki Devi
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
