Dismissed
Manju Devi v. Riddhakaran Jat
Rajasthan HCCMA/602/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Civil miscellaneous appeal dismissed due to non-removal of defects despite multiple extensions of time granted by the court and the Registrar.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2024:RJ-JD:11916]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 602/2020
¶4
- Manju Devi W/o Shri Chainaram, Aged About 25 Years, B/ c Jat, R/o Village Gangwa, Tehsil Parbatsar, District Nagaur.
¶5
- Smt. Anita W/o Shri Hiraram, Aged About 62 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Village Gangwa, Tehsil Parbatsar, District Nagaur.
¶6
----Appellants
¶7
Versus
¶8
- Riddhakaran Jat S/o Shri Madhuram, B/c Jat, R/o Village Khajpura, Ps Roopangarh, Tehsil Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Driver - Jeep Mahindar Di No. Rj-14-Ua-2507)
¶9
- Nandaram S/o Shri Lalaram, B/c Jat, R/o Village Khajpura, Ps Roopangarh, Tehsil Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Owner - Jeep Mahindar Di No. Rj-14-Ua-2507)
¶10
- The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Divisional Office, Ajmer 331400, Shanti Mansion Kotwali Scheme, Khailand Market, Ajmer (Insurer - Jeep Mahindar Di No. Rj-14-Ua2507)
¶11
----Respondents
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Manju Devi W/o Shri Chainaram
- appellant
Smt. Anita W/o Shri Hiraram
- respondent
Riddhakaran Jat S/o Shri Madhuram
- respondent
Nandaram S/o Shri Lalaram
- respondent
The New India Assurance Company Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/602/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court