Petitioner sought to invalidate an already pronounced order on the ground that six months had elapsed since reservation. The court refused to entertain the request and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Misc. Application No. 82/2016
Asha Ram
----Petitioner
Versus
Pushkarna Brahmin Bhimji Ka Mohala and Anr.
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vijay Anand Vyas (son of applicant) present inperson. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Nonepresent |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
11/03/2024
(REKHA BORANA),J
644-Vij/-
Asha Ram
Pushkarna Brahmin Bhimji Ka Mohala
Anr.
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
