Allowed

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sumitra Devi and Ors.

Rajasthan HC9 Sept 2024CMA/4065/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed the impugned order restricting and suspending the driver's license. The court allowed the revocation proceedings and restoration of the license in the public interest, noting the vehicle operator had already surrendered the license and statutory powers existed.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order restricting and suspending the driver's license was quashed, allowing the restoration proceedings to continue.

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sumitra Devi… — Motor Accident Claims | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:38150]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4065/2017

¶4

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd., Having Its Local Office At Office No. 2, Third Floor, C-99, Singhvi Upasana Tower, Shubhash Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Having Its Regional Office At N-22, Second Foor, Sector- 18, Noida - 201301 Through Its Constituted Attorney

¶5

----Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. Sumitra Devi W/o Late Shri Deshraj, R/o Malakheda, Teh. And Distt. Alwar

¶8

Lalita D/o Late Shri Deshraj, R/o Malakheda, Teh. And Distt. Alwar

¶9

Mamta D/o Late Shri Deshraj, R/o Malakheda, Teh. And Distt. Alwar

¶10

Pushpendra S/o Late Shri Deshraj, R/o Malakheda, Teh. And Distt. Alwar

¶11

Ravindra S/o Late Shri Deshraj, R/o Malakheda, Teh. And Distt. Alwar

¶12

Kisturi W/o Chiranjilal, R/o Malakheda, Teh. And Distt. Alwar

¶13

Ramesh Chand S/o Shri Sugan Chand, R/o Hateela Ka Bas, Kerwaval, Teh. And Distt. Alwar Driver Cum Owner Of Tractor No. Rj-02-Rb-4988

¶14

7/1. Shri Sugan Singh S/o Shri Harilal, R/o Village Hatila Ka Bas, Kerwawal, Tehsil Malakheda, Dist. Alwar

¶15

7/2. Smt. Laxmi W/o Sugan Singh R/o Village Hatila Ka Bas, Kerwawal Tehsil Malakheda, Dist. Alwar.

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Virendra Agrawal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shweta Soni, Adv.

¶18

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶19

09/09/2024

¶20

[2024:RJ-JP:38150]

¶21

(2 of 3) [CMA-4065/2017]

¶22

vihykFkhZ chek daiuh dh vksj ls ;g vihy fo}ku eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] vyoj }kjk eksVj nq?kZVuk okn la[;k 334@2011 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o vokMZ fnukad 21-06-2017 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gSA

¶23

okgu Lokeh@pkyd vFkok nkosnkjksa dh vksj ls dksbZ vihy izLrqr ugha dh x;h gSA

¶24

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&chek daiuh dk lhfer fuosnu gS fd nq?kZVuk ds le; vkjksfir VªsDVj esa O;kolkf;d iz;kstu ds fy, bZaVksa dk ifjogu fd;k tk jgk Fkk] pkyd ds ikl ifjogu ;ku dks pykus dk dksbZ oS/k pkyd vuqKk i= ugha Fkk] ,slh fLFkfr esa chek daiuh dk nkf;Ro izfrdj ds laca/k esa ugha curk gS] bl fcUnq ij vf/kdj.k dk fu.kZ; o vokMZ rF;ksa ,oa fof/k ds vuq:i ugha gS] var esa vihyk/khu fu.kZ; o vokMZ vikLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶25

blds foijhr izR;FkhZ@nkosnkjksa dh vksj ls vihyk/khu fu.kZ; rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gksuk crkrs gq, ;g vihy [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶26

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA gLrxr izdj.k esa vkjksfir okgu nq?kZVuk esa vkfyIr jgk gS] bl ckcr dksbZ fookn ugha gSA ;g Hkh Lohdr fLFkfr gS fd rRle; VªsDVj esa bZaVksa dk ifjogu fd;k tk jgk Fkk] ijUrq ;g ifjogu df"k dk;ksZa esa lq/kkj gsrq fd;k tk jgk gks] bl laHkkouk ls bUdkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA O;kolkf;d ifjogu gsrq bZaVsa ifjogu dh tk jgh Fkha] bl lq>ko dks nkosnkjksa }kjk vLohdkj fd;k x;k gS] rFkk vihykFkhZ&chek daiuh dh vksj ls dksbZ ldkjkRed lk{; izLrqr ugha dh x;h gSA vr% ;g okgu O;kolkf;d iz;kstukFkZ iz;ksx esa yk;k

¶27

[2024:RJ-JP:38150]

¶28

(3 of 3) [CMA-4065/2017]

¶29

tk jgk Fkk] ;g rF; izekf.kr ugh gSA vf/kdj.k dk fu.kZ; o fu"d"kZ bl fcUnq ij rF;ksa ds vuq:i gSA

¶30

tgka rd oS/k pkyu vuqKfIr dk iz'u gS] okgu pkyd ds ikl gYds eksVj ;ku dks pykus dk ykbZlsUl FkkA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ¼2016½ 4 ,llhlh 298 eqdqan nsokaxu cuke vksfj;aVy ba';ksjsal daiuh fyfeVsM o vU; ds ekeys esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr gqbZ gS fd fdlh Hkh O;fDr ds ikl gYds eksVj ;ku pykus dk ykbZlsUl gS] rks og 7500 fdyksxzke rd ds otu ds ifjogu ;ku dks pykus gsrq l{ke gSA ;gka ;g Hkh mYys[kuh; gS fd vkjksfir VªsDVj dk otu 1745 fdyksxzke FkkA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa bl fcUnq ij Hkh vf/kdj.k dk fu.kZ; rF;ksa o fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds vuq:i gSA

¶31

mijksDr foospukuqlkj fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&chek daiuh }kjk fy;s x;s rdZ Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugh gSaA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vihyk/khu fu.kZ; iq"V gksus rFkk ;g vihy [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶32

mijksDrkuqlkj vihykFkhZ&chek daiuh dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mDr izdkj ls vLohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶33

v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k ;fn izkIr gks j[kk gS rks fu.kZ; dh izfr ds lkFk vfoyEc ykSVk;k tkosA

¶34

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶35

MANISH SAINI /45

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sumitra Devi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sumitra Devi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkhiladi S/O Shri Shankarlal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep S/O Sanwalram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Aasif S/O Shri Sabir Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangesh Arora S/O Shri Har Bhagwan, Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghunandan and Anr. Vs Mukesh Lodha and Ors.

Girisa @ Greesa W/O Shri Satyaveer Vs State of Rajasthan